WORKCHOICES
INQUIRY
CONCLUDES
LAWS
SHOWN TO
BE BAD;
SA
UNIONS
SUGGEST
SOLUTIONS
14
August 2007
Strengthening
the
state
Industrial
Relations
commission
and
giving
SafeWork
SA more
teeth to
protect
workers
are
amongst
the
proposals
contained
in SA
Unions'
final
submission
to the
SAIRC's
inquiry
into the
impact
of the
federal
government's
controversial
WorkChoices
laws.
SA
Unions
is also
proposing
that
there be
an
inquiry
into the
gender-pay
equity
gap, and
increased
state
government
support
for
organisations
offering
assistance
to
workers,
especially
those
most
vulnerable
to the
federal
laws,
including
young
workers
and
women.
The
pay-gender
equity
inquiry
call
follows
a
national
report
released
yesterday
titled
"Women
and
WorkChoices".
It
showed
the
federal
laws are
directly
responsible
for job
insecurity
which is
undermining
women's
capacity
to
bargain
for
proper
pay and
conditions.
SA
Unions
Secretary,
Janet
Giles
says:
"What
has
become
increasingly
apparent
during
the
course
of this
inquiry
is the
real
impact
that the
federal
laws
have had
in
undermining
the hard
won
protections
that
workers
have
achieved
over the
past
century
or
more."
"These
laws
have
destroyed
the
foundation
stones
of our
previously
fair and
balanced
industrial
system.
The
notion
of
arbitration
and
collective
bargaining
to
provide
a level
playing
field
for
employers
and
employees
has been
obliterated."
"Workers
have no
protections,
and no
recourse
or
avenues
of
appeal.
They can
be
unfairly
sacked,
have
their
pay cut,
their
shifts
manipulated,
their
leave
reduced
- and
more -
and
there is
nothing
they can
do about
it."
"No
amount
of slick
federal
government
advertising
can hide
the grim
reality
of the
evidence
presented
to this
inquiry.
These
laws are
hurting
real
people,
yet the
Howard
government
in its
ivory
tower in
Canberra
is
deliberately
ignoring
their
pain and
continuing
to
direct
money
and
power to
employer
unions."
"The
workers
- and
voters -
of
Australia
have
been
sold a
pup.
These
laws are
ineffective,
unfair
and
unAustralian.
Extensive
evidence
to this
inquiry
supports
that
view.
It is
interesting
to note
that the
only
apparent
supporters
of the
federal
legislation,
employer
unions,
were
unable
to
provide
any
evidence
of the
so-called
positive
aspects
of the
legislation
to this
inquiry.
We can
only
surmise
that's
because
there
are no
positives
to
present."